The Monastic Pint Answers from church history on today's questions

What is the unforgivable sin?

What Christian writers said, from about AD 70 to 1938.

225 passages · 44 writers · 14 centuries

The short answer

Of the 225 passages here, from 44 writers between AD 70 and 1938, 154 state a position on the sin against the Holy Spirit and 71 mention it in passing. Most writers read Matthew 12:31-32 as naming a sin that is not forgiven, and they differ on what the sin is. Jerome, Chrysostom, and Wesley identify it with ascribing Christ's works to the devil, Calvin with deliberate resistance to a truth the person knows, and Aquinas with contempt for the things that lead to repentance. Jerome and Augustine identify it with final impenitence, Ambrose with separation from the unity of the Church, and Berkhof rejects the view that it is continued unbelief. Matthew Henry says that the greatness of a sin is no bar to pardon on repentance and that fear of having committed this sin is a sign that one has not, and Berkhof says the same of those who fear it. No Orthodox writer after the patristic era, no Lutheran writer, and no Catholic source after the Council of Trent (1551) appears.

What the sin against the Holy Spirit is

37 passages · 14 writers · 300s to 1900s

Writers who define the sin as attributing Christ's works to the devil, as knowing and malicious rejection of the truth, or as contempt for the grace the Spirit gives.

c. 370–419

When the apostle Peter, taken aback by a maid’s question, denied the Lord, did he sin against the Son of Man or against the Holy Ghost? … His sin, therefore, was not the sin against the Holy Ghost which can never be forgiven. It is obvious, then, that this sin involves blasphemy, calling one Beelzebub for his actions, whose virtues prove him to be God. If Novatian can bring an instance of a renegade who has called Christ Beelzebub, I will at once give up my position and admit that after such a fall the denier can win no forgiveness.

Jerome, Jerome, The Letters of St. Jerome 42 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 2, Vol. 6)

c. 389–391

What He saith, then, is this: Be it so: ye are offended at me, because of the flesh with which I am encompassed: can ye say of the Spirit also, We know it not? And therefore is your blasphemy unpardonable, and both here and hereafter shall ye suffer punishment.

John Chrysostom, John Chrysostom, The Homilies of St. John Chrysostom 44 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 1, Vol. 10)

1265–1274

The sin against the Holy Ghost consists in the contempt of those goods which lead directly to repentance and the remission of sins.

Thomas Aquinas, Aquinas, Summa Theologica II-II.Q105.A2

1559

I say therefore that he sins against the Holy Spirit who, while so constrained by the power of divine truth that he cannot plead ignorance, yet deliberately resists, and that merely for the sake of resisting. For Christ, in explanation of what he had said, immediately adds, “Whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him; but whosoever speaketh against the holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him,” (Mt. 12:31). And Matthew uses the term spirit of blasphemyThe Greek is “του̑ πνεύματος βλασφημία” This Calvin translates in Latin, “Spiritum blasphemiæ,”, and in French, “Esprit de blaspheme.” for blasphemy against the Spirit. How can any one insult the Son, without at the same time attacking the Spirit? In this way. Those who in ignorance assail the unknown truth of God, and yet are so disposed that they would be unwilling to extinguish the truth of God when manifested to them, or utter one word against him whom they knew to be the Lord’s Anointed, sin against the Father and the Son.

John Calvin, Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion III.3

1755–1765

How many sermons, yea, volumes, have been written concerning it? And yet there is nothing plainer in all the Bible. It is neither more nor less than the ascribing those miracles to the power of the devil, which Christ wrought by the power of the Holy Ghost.

John Wesley, Wesley, Notes on the Bible 1.12

1858

The sin to which our Lord refers in this passage appears to be the sin of deliberately rejecting God's truth with the heart, while the truth is clearly known with the head. It is a combination of light in the understanding and determined wickedness in the will.

J.C. Ryle, Ryle, Expository Thoughts on Luke Luke 12:8-12 (Expository Thoughts on the Gospels, Vol. 3)

Final impenitence and refusing forgiveness

25 passages · 7 writers · 300s to 1900s

Writers who identify the sin with persistent impenitence, with refusing the forgiveness offered in the Church, or with separation from its unity, and writers who dispute that reading.

c. 374–397

25. Lastly, that we may know that He is speaking of those who destroy the unity of the Church, we find it written: “He that is not with Me is against Me, and he that gathered not with Me, scattereth.” And that we might know that He is speaking of these, He at once added: “Therefore I say unto you, every sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men, but blasphemies against the Spirit shall not be forgiven unto men.”

Ambrose of Milan, Ambrose, Concerning Repentance 3.4 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 2, Vol. 10)

c. 386–430

This impenitence then is “the blasphemy of the Spirit, which shall not be forgiven, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.” For against the Holy Spirit, by whom they whose sins are all forgiven are baptized, and whom the Church hath received, that “whosesoever sins she remits, they may be remitted,” does he speak, whether in the thought only, or also in the tongue, a very heinous and exceedingly ungodly word, who “when the patience of God leadeth him to repentance, after his hardness and impenitent heart treasureth up unto himself wrath against the day of wrath, and revelation of the righteous judgment of God, who will render to every man according to his deeds.” This impenitence then, for so by some one general name may we call both this blasphemy and the word against the Holy Ghost which hath no forgiveness for ever; this impenitence, I say, against which both the herald and the Judge cried out, saying,

Augustine of Hippo, Augustine, Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament 23 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 1, Vol. 6)

1559

22. Here, however, it is proper to consider what the dreadful iniquity is which is not to be pardoned. The definition which Augustine somewhere givesAugust. Lib. de Correp. et Gratia, cap. 12 —viz. that it is obstinate perverseness, with distrust of pardon, continued till death,—scarcely agrees with the words of Christ, that it shall not be forgiven in this world. … I say therefore that he sins against the Holy Spirit who, while so constrained by the power of divine truth that he cannot plead ignorance, yet deliberately resists, and that merely for the sake of resisting.

John Calvin, Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion III.3

1904–1910

The Gospel knows nothing of irreclaimable outcasts. To it there is but one unpardonable sin, and that is the sin of refusing the cleansing of Christ’s blood and the sanctifying of Christ’s Spirit.

Alexander Maclaren, Maclaren, Psalms 1.8 (Expositions of Holy Scripture, Vol. 4)

1938

A related view is that expressed by some in our own day, that it consists in continued unbelief, a refusal up to the very end to accept Jesus Christ by faith. But on this supposition it would follow that every one who died in a state of impenitence and unbelief had committed this sin, while according to Scripture it must be something of a very specific nature. (3) In connection with their denial of the perseverance of the saints, later Lutheran theologians taught that only regenerate persons could commit this sin, and sought support for this view in Heb. 6:4-6. But this is an un-Scriptural position, and the Canons of Dort reject, among others, also the error of those who teach that the regenerate can commit the sin against the Holy Spirit.

Louis Berkhof, Berkhof, Systematic Theology 2.2.4

Why words against the Spirit differ from words against the Son

35 passages · 17 writers · 200s to 1900s

Explanations of why speaking against the Son of Man can be forgiven and speaking against the Holy Spirit cannot, and of what "neither in this world nor in the world to come" means.

c. 220–250

Is it because the Holy Spirit is of more value than Christ that the sin against Him cannot be forgiven? May it not rather be that all rational beings have part in Christ, and that forgiveness is extended to them when they repent of their sins, while only those have part in the Holy Spirit who have been found worthy of it, and that there cannot well be any forgiveness for those who fall away to evil in spite of such great and powerful cooperation, and who defeat the counsels of the Spirit who is in them.

Origen of Alexandria, Origen, Epistle to Gregory and Origen's Commentary on the Gospel of John 3.2.6 (Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 9)

381

Is an offence against the Son different from one against the Holy Spirit? For as their dignity is one, and common to both, so too is the offence. But if any one, led astray by the visible human body, should think somewhat more remissly than is fitting concerning the Body of Christ (for it ought not to appear of little worth to us, seeing it is the palace of chastity, and the fruit of the Virgin), he incurs guilt, but he is not shut out from pardon, which he may attain to by faith. But if any one should deny the dignity, majesty, and eternal power of the Holy Spirit, and should think that devils are cast out not in the Spirit of God, but in Beelzebub, there can be no attaining of pardon there where is the fulness of sacrilege; for he who has denied the Spirit has denied also the Father and the Son, since the same is the Spirit of God Who is the Spirit of Christ.

Ambrose of Milan, Ambrose, On the Holy Spirit 2.4 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 2, Vol. 10)

1265–1274

So too, the sin against the Holy Ghost is said to be unpardonable, by reason of its nature, in so far as it removes those things which are a means towards the pardon of sins. This does not, however, close the way of forgiveness and healing to an all-powerful and merciful God, Who, sometimes, by a miracle, so to speak, restores spiritual health to such men. … Hence considered in itself this sin is unpardonable, although God can pardon it.

Thomas Aquinas, Aquinas, Summa Theologica II-II.Q14.A3

1540–1564

Why is it said that he who blasphemes against the Spirit is a more heinous sinner than he who blasphemes against Christ? Is it because the majesty of the Spirit is greater, that a crime committed against him must be punished with greater severity? Certainly that is not the reason; for as the fullness of the Godhead ( Colossians 2:9 ) shines in Christ, he who pours contempt upon him overturns and destroys, as far as it lies in his power, the whole glory of God.

John Calvin, Calvin, Harmony of the Evangelists, Vol. 2 1.13 (Calvin's Commentaries, Vol. 32)

1904–1910

The true reason why that sin has never forgiveness is suggested by the accurate rendering, ‘Is guilty of an eternal sin’ (R.V.). Since the sin is eternal, the forgiveness is impossible. Practically hardened and permanent unbelief, conjoined with malicious hatred of the only means of forgiveness, is the unforgivable sin. Much torture of heart would have been saved if it had been observed that the Scripture expression is not sin, but blasphemy.

Alexander Maclaren, Maclaren, Mark 1.14 (Expositions of Holy Scripture, Vol. 8)

Who can commit it, and which sins remain pardonable

24 passages · 9 writers · 200s to 1900s

Statements on whether the sin can be committed today, by whom, and how far forgiveness extends to every other sin.

c. 300–400

“Such is the nature of the one and only God, who made the world, and who created us, and who has given us all things, that as long as any one is within the limit of piety, and does not blaspheme His Holy Spirit, through His love towards him He brings the soul to Himself by reason of His love towards it. And although it be sinful, it is His nature to save it, after it has been suitably punished for the deeds it hath done. But if any one shall deny Him, or in any other way be guilty of impiety against Him, and then shall repent, he shall be punished indeed for the sins he hath committed against Him, but he shall be saved, because he turned and lived.

Pseudo-Clement, Pseudo-Clement, Pseudo-Clementine Literature 4.6.6 (Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 8)

417

49. Let them understand, therefore, that it is not every sin, but only some sin, against the Holy Ghost which is incapable of forgiveness. For just as when our Lord said, "If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin," it is clear that He did not wish it to be understood that they would have been free from all sin, since they were filled with many grievous sins, but that they would have been free from some special sin, the absence of which would have left them in a position to receive remission of all the sins which yet remained in them, viz., the sin of not believing in Him when He came to them; for they could not have had this sin, had He not come. In like manner, also, when He said, "Whosoever sinneth against the Holy Ghost,"or, "Whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost;" it is clear that He does not refer to every sin of whatsoever kind against the Holy Ghost, in word or deed, but would have us understand some special and peculiar sin.

Augustine of Hippo, Augustine, The Correction of the Donatists 11 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 1, Vol. 4)

1714

Here is a gracious assurance of the pardon of all sin upon gospel terms: this Christ says to us, and it is a comfortable saying, that the greatness of sin shall be no bar to our acceptance with God, if we truly repent and believe the gospel: All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men. Though the sin has been as scarlet and crimson ( Isa. i. 18 ), though ever so heinous in its nature, ever so much aggravated by its circumstances, and ever so often repeated, though it reach up to the heavens, yet with the Lord there is mercy, that reacheth beyond the heavens; mercy will be extended even to blasphemy, a sin immediately touching God's name and honour.

Matthew Henry, Henry, Commentary on Matthew 12.3 (Commentary on the Whole Bible, Vol. 5)

1755–1765

10. And whosoever - As if he had said, Yet the denying me in some degree, may, upon true repentance, be forgiven; but if it rise so high as that of the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost, it shall never be forgiven, neither is there place for repentance.

John Wesley, Wesley, Notes on the Bible 3.12

1858

The distinction between speaking a word against the Son of Man and blaspheming against the Holy Spirit should not be overlooked. … The sin against the Holy Spirit was committed by those who, after the Day of Pentecost and the outpouring of the Spirit and the full proclamation of the Gospel, persisted in unbelief and obstinate impenitence and were given over to a reprobate mind. These especially grieved the Spirit and resisted his work.

J.C. Ryle, Ryle, Expository Thoughts on Luke Luke 12:8-12 (Expository Thoughts on the Gospels, Vol. 3)

1930–1933

In saying that Jesus had an unclean spirit (verse 30) they had attributed to the devil the work of the Holy Spirit. This is the unpardonable sin and it can be committed today by men who call the work of Christ the work of the devil, Nietzsche may be cited as an instance in point.

A.T. Robertson, Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament 3.3

Hebrews 6 and 10, apostasy, and perseverance

9 passages · 9 writers · 100s to 1900s

Writers on the passages in Hebrews about those who fall away or sin willfully, whether they describe the same sin, and whether a believer can lose salvation.

c. 197–220

Warning, accordingly, the disciples to omit all first principles, and strive rather after perfection, and not lay again the foundations of repentance from the works of the dead, he says: “For impossible it is that they who have once been illuminated, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have participated in the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the word of God and found it sweet, when they shall—their age already setting—have fallen away, should be again recalled unto repentance, crucifying again for themselves the Son of God, and dishonouring Him.” “For the earth which hath drunk the rain often descending upon it, and hath borne grass apt for them on whose account it is tilled withal, attaineth God’s blessing; but if it bring forth thorns, it is reprobate, and nighest to cursing, whose end is (doomed) unto utter burning.” He who learnt this from apostles, and taught it with apostles, never knew of any “second repentance” promised by apostles to the adulterer and fornicator.

Tertullian, Tertullian, On Modesty 20 (Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 4)

c. 398–404

That he does not take away repentance, nor the propitiation through repentance, nor does he thrust away and cast down with despair the fallen. He is not thus an enemy of our salvation; but what? He takes away the second Washing. For he did not say, no more is there repentance, or no more is there remission, but “no more” is there a “sacrifice,” that is, there is no more a second Cross.

John Chrysostom, John Chrysostom, The Homilies of St. John Chrysostom on the Epistle to the Hebrews 24 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 1, Vol. 14)

1259–1265

HEREBY is excluded the error of the Novatians, who denied pardon to sinners after baptism.Socrates, Hist. Eccl. iv, 28, quotes the Novatians as saying: “It is forbidden to admit to Communion him who has denied Christ. He should be exhorted to repent, but must look for his pardon from God, who alone is competent to give it.” They took occasion of their error from the text: It is impossible for those who have been once enlightened [φωτισθέντας, baptised], and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have been made partakers of the Holy Ghost . . . . and have fallen, to be again renewed [ἀνακαινίζειν, renovari, Vulg.] unto penance (Heb. vi, 4, 6). But the sense is plain from the immediate context: crucifying to themselves again the Son of God, and making him a mockery.

Thomas Aquinas, Aquinas, Summa contra Gentiles 4.71

1758

Those that the apostle here has respect to, must be such as were guilty of the unpardonable sin. The falling away that he speaks of is an apostacy from Christianity.

Jonathan Edwards, Edwards, Notes on the Bible 24

1930–1933

The present active infinitive of ανακαινιζω (late verb, ανα, καινος, here only in the N.T., but ανακαινοω, 2Co 4:16; Col 3:10 ) with αδυνατον bluntly denies the possibility of renewal for apostates from Christ (cf. 3:12-4:2). It is a terrible picture and cannot be toned down.

A.T. Robertson, Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament 20.6

The sin unto death in 1 John 5:16

9 passages · 6 writers · 100s to 1900s

Writers on the sin for which John says prayer is not commanded, and how it relates to other sins and to the sin against the Spirit.

c. 197–220

“Every unrighteousness is sin; and there is a sin unto death. But we know that every one who hath been born of God sinneth not” —to wit, the sin which is unto death. Thus there is no course left for you, but either to deny that adultery and fornication are mortal sins; or else to confess them irremissible, for which it is not permitted even to make successful intercession.

Tertullian, Tertullian, On Modesty 19 (Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 4)

c. 386–430

The “sin,” therefore, of a brother, “unto death,” I suppose to be when, after the acknowledging of God through the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, one fights against the brotherhood, and is set on by the fire-brands of hatred against the very grace through which he was reconciled to God. But “a sin not unto death” is when a person, not having alienated his love from his brother, yet through some infirmity of mind may have failed to exhibit the due offices of brotherhood. Wherefore, on the one hand, the Lord on the cross said, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do,” since they had not yet, by being made partakers of the grace of the Holy Spirit, entered into the fellowship of holy brotherhood; and blessed Stephen in the Acts of the Apostles prays for them who are stoning him; because they had not yet believed Christ, and were not fighting against that grace of communion. On the other hand, the apostle Paul does not pray for Alexander, and the reason I suppose, is, that this man was a brother, and had sinned “unto death,” i.e. by opposing the brotherhood in a spirit of hatred.

Augustine of Hippo, Augustine, Ten Homilies on the First Epistle of John 2 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 1, Vol. 7)

1674

There remains nothing for him who doth despite to the Spirit of grace but a “certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries,” Heb. x. 27, 29. This is that “sin unto death” whose remission is not to be prayed for, John v. 16: for he having taken upon him to make effectual unto us the great remedy provided in the blood of Christ for the pardon of our sins, if he in the prosecution of that work be despised, blasphemed, despitefully used, there neither is relief nor can there be pardon for that sin. For whence, in that case, should they arise or spring? As God hath not another Son to offer another sacrifice for sin, — so that he by whom his sacrifice is despised can have none remaining for him, — no more hath he another Spirit to make that sacrifice effectual unto us, if the Holy Ghost in his work be despised and rejected.

John Owen, Owen, Pneumatologia 1.1

1930–1933

Most sins are not mortal sins, but clearly John conceives of a sin that is deadly enough to be called "unto death." … Jesus spoke of the unpardonable sin (Mr 3:29; Mt 12:32; Lu 12:10 ), which was attributing to the devil the manifest work of the Holy Spirit. It is possible that John has this idea in mind when he applies it to those who reject Jesus Christ as God's Son and set themselves up as antichrists.

A.T. Robertson, Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament 24.5

Fear of having committed it, despair, and Judas

8 passages · 6 writers · 300s to 1900s

Writers on those who fear they have committed the sin, on despair as a danger in itself, and on Judas and Peter as test cases.

c. 386–407

For this reason also the wicked one dragged Judas out of this world lest he should make a fair beginning, and so return by means of repentance to the point from which he fell. For although it may seem a strange thing to say, I will not admit even that sin to be too great for the succour which is brought to us from repentance.

John Chrysostom, John Chrysostom, An Exhortation to Theodore After His Fall 3 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 1, Vol. 9)

1378

One who despairs despises My mercy, making his sin to be greater than mercy and goodness. Wherefore, if a man fall into this sin, he does not repent, and does not truly grieve for his offense against Me as he should, grieving indeed for his own loss, but not for the offense done to Me, and therefore he receives eternal damnation. See, therefore, that this sin alone leads him to hell, where he is punished for this and all the other sins which he has committed; whereas had he grieved and repented for the offense done to Me, and hoped in My mercy, he would have found mercy.

Catherine of Siena, Catherine of Siena, The Dialogue 4.31

1378

“Despair is that sin which is pardoned neither here nor hereafter, and it is because despair displeases Me so much that I wish them to hope in My mercy at the point of death, even if their life have been disordered and wicked. This is why during their life I use this sweet trick with them, making them hope greatly in My mercy, for when, having fed themselves with this hope, they arrive at death, they are not so inclined to abandon it, on account of the severe condemnation they receive, as if they had not so nourished themselves.

Catherine of Siena, Catherine of Siena, The Dialogue 4.31

1714

We have reason to think that none are guilty of this sin, who believe that Christ is the Son of God, and sincerely desire to have part in his merit and mercy: and those who fear they have committed this sin, give a good sign that they have not.

Matthew Henry, Henry, Commentary on Matthew 12.3 (Commentary on the Whole Bible, Vol. 5)

1904–1910

Be sure of this, that if Judas Iscariot, when his ‘soul flared forth in the dark,’ died without hope and without pardon, it was not because his crime was too great for forgiveness, but because the forgiveness had never been asked. There is no unpardonable sin except that of refusing the pardon that avails for all sin.

Alexander Maclaren, Maclaren, Matthew IX to XVIII 2.35 (Expositions of Holy Scripture, Vol. 7)

The lapsed, Novatian, and the Church's power to forgive

7 passages · 7 writers · 100s to 1500s

Writers on whether sins after baptism, including denial under persecution, can be forgiven by the Church, and on which sins early writers called irremissible.

c. 197–220

We agree that the causes of repentance are sins. These we divide into two issues: some will be remissible, some irremissible: in accordance wherewith it will be doubtful to no one that some deserve chastisement, some condemnation. Every sin is dischargeable either by pardon or else by penalty: by pardon as the result of chastisement, by penalty as the result of condemnation. Touching this difference, we have not only already premised certain antithetical passages of the Scriptures, on one hand retaining, on the other remitting, sins; but John, too, will teach us: “If any knoweth his brother to be sinning a sin not unto death, he shall request, and life shall be given to him;” because he is not “sinning unto death,” this will be remissible. “(There) is a sin unto death; not for this do I say that any is to request” —this will be irremissible.

Tertullian, Tertullian, On Modesty 2 (Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 4)

c. 246–258

28. That remission cannot in the Church be granted unto him who has sinned against God (i.e., the Holy Ghost). In the Gospel according to Matthew: “Whosoever shall say a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him; but whosoever shall speak against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world nor in the world to come.” Also according to Mark: “All sins shall be forgiven, and blasphemies, to the sons of men; but whoever shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, but he shall be guilty of eternal sin.” Of this same thing in the first book of Kings: “If a man sin by offending against a man, they shall pray the Lord for him; but if a man sin against God, who shall pray for him?”

Cyprian of Carthage, Cyprian, The Treatises of Cyprian 12.4.30 (Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 5)

c. 370–419

2. But to put a more searching question still: let Novatian tell us how he distinguishes speaking against the Son of Man from blasphemy against the Holy Ghost. For I maintain that on his principles men who have denied Christ under persecution have only spoken against the Son of Man, and have not blasphemed the Holy Ghost. For when a man is asked if he is a Christian, and declares that he is not; obviously in denying Christ, that is the Son of Man, he does no despite to the Holy Ghost.

Jerome, Jerome, The Letters of St. Jerome 42 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 2, Vol. 6)

c. 374–397

5. But they say that those should not be restored to communion who have fallen into denial of the faith. If they made the crime of sacrilege the only exception to receiving forgiveness, they would be acting harshly indeed, and, as it would seem, would be in opposition to the divine utterances only, while consistent with their own assertions. For when the Lord forgave all sins, He made an exception of none. But since, as it were after the fashion of the Stoics, they think that all sins are equal in gravity, and assert that he who has stolen a common fowl, as they say, no less than he who has smothered his father, should be for ever excluded from the divine mysteries, how can they select those guilty of one special offence, since even they themselves cannot deny that it is most unjust that the penalty of one should extend to many?

Ambrose of Milan, Ambrose, Concerning Repentance 2.2 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 2, Vol. 10)

1551

By which action so signal, and words so clear, the consent of all the Fathers has ever understood that the power of forgiving and retaining sins was communicated to the apostles and their lawful successors, for the reconciling of the faithful who have fallen after baptism. And the Catholic Church with great reason repudiated and condemned as heretics the Novatians, who of old obstinately denied that power of forgiving.

Council of Trent, Council of Trent, Canons and Dogmatic Decrees of the Council of Trent Session 14, ch. I

1566

Notwithstanding, we always teach that an entrance unto God is open for all sinners, and that this God does forgive all the sins of the faithful, only that one sin excepted which is committed against the Holy Ghost ( Mark 3:28,29 ). And, therefore, we condemn the old and new Novatians and Catharists; and especially we condemn the Pope’s painful doctrine of penance.

Reformed Churches, Second Helvetic Confession, Second Helvetic Confession 14.2

1571

Not every deadly sin willingly committed after Baptism is sin against the Holy Ghost, and unpardonable. Wherefore the grant of repentance is not to be denied to such as fall into sin after Baptism. After we have received the Holy Ghost, we may depart from grace given, and fall into sin, and by the grace of God we may arise again, and amend our lives. And therefore they are to be condemned, which say, they can no more sin as long as they live here, or deny the place of forgiveness to such as truly repent.

Church of England, Thirty-Nine Articles, Thirty-Nine Articles 16

Passing mentions

Named as the gravest or unforgiven sin

11 passages · 11 writers · 1st c. to 1900s

Writers who mention blasphemy against the Spirit as unforgiven, without defining it or building an argument on it.

c. 70–110

And every prophet that speaketh in the Spirit ye shall neither try nor judge; for every sin shall be forgiven, but this sin shall not be forgiven.

Anonymous (ANF), Anonymous, The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles 3.11 (Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 7)

180

We must conclude, moreover, that these men (the Montanists) can not admit the Apostle Paul either. For, in his Epistle to the Corinthians, he speaks expressly of prophetical gifts, and recognises men and women prophesying in the Church. Sinning, therefore, in all these particulars, against the Spirit of God, they fall into the irremissible sin.

Irenaeus of Lyons, Irenaeus, Against Heresies: Book III 12 (Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 1)

1120–1153

Be it that blasphemy against the Father or the Son may be forgiven, will blasphemy against the Spirit? The Angel of the Lord is waiting to cut you asunder; for you have said “The Holy Spirit in God is not power or wisdom.” So the foot of pride stumbles where it intrudes [where it ought not].

Bernard of Clairvaux, Bernard of Clairvaux, Some Letters of Saint Bernard 64

1834–1885

9. We see the danger of blasphemy - the danger of trifling with the influences of the Holy Spirit, Mat 12:31-32. Even if we do not commit the unpardonable sin, yet we see that all trifling with the Holy Spirit is a sin very near to God, and attended with infinite danger. He that "laughs away" the thoughts of death and eternity; he that seeks the society of the frivolous and trifling, or of the sensual and profane, for the express purpose of driving away these thoughts; and he that struggles directly against his convictions, and is resolved that he will not submit to God, may be, for aught he knows, making his damnation sure.

Albert Barnes, Barnes, Notes on the Bible Matthew 12:46

1938

The man who is burdened with the sense of sin certainly does not feel that way about it. He is grateful, too, that not only the sins which he committed in ignorance are pardonable, but all the others as well, with the single exception of the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.

Louis Berkhof, Berkhof, Systematic Theology 2.2.2

Used in arguments about the Spirit's divinity

13 passages · 11 writers · 200s to 1800s

Writers who cite the saying about blasphemy against the Spirit to show the Spirit's divine status or to condemn those who deny it.

c. 318–371

For the Jews saying that He cast out devils in Beelzebub, He answered and said to them, for the exposure of their blasphemy, ‘But if I through the Spirit of God cast out demons .’ … Of course too He signified that the blasphemy offered to the Holy Ghost is greater than that against His humanity, when He said, ‘Whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him;’ such as were those who said, ‘Is not this the carpenter’s son ?’ but they who blaspheme against the Holy Ghost, and ascribe the deeds of the Word to the devil, shall have inevitable punishment

Athanasius of Alexandria, Athanasius, Against the Arians. (Orationes contra Arianos IV.) 2.1.12 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 2, Vol. 4)

357–378

All who call the Holy Ghost a creature we pity, on the ground that, by this utterance, they are falling into the unpardonable sin of blasphemy against Him. I need use no argument to prove to those who are even slightly trained in Scripture, that the creature is separated from the Godhead.

Basil of Caesarea, Basil, The Letters 159 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 2, Vol. 8)

1674

It is supposed that blasphemy may be against the person of the Father: so was it in him who “blasphemed the name of Jehovah and cursed” by it, Lev. xxiv. 11. The Son, as to his distinct person, may be blasphemed; so it is said here expressly; — and thereon it is added that the Holy Ghost also may be distinctly blasphemed, or be the immediate object of that sin which is declared to be inexpiable. To suppose now that this Holy Ghost is not a divine person is for men to dream whilst they seem to be awake.

John Owen, Owen, Pneumatologia 1.3

1871

Christ says, “All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.” (Matt. xii. 31.) The unpardonable sin, then, is speaking against the Holy Ghost. This could not be unless the Holy Ghost were God. The Apostle, in 1 Cor. ii. 10, 11, says that the Spirit knows all things, even the deep things (the most secret purposes) of God.

Charles Hodge, Hodge, Systematic Theology I.8.1 (Vol. 1)

Apostasy and the Hebrews passages

8 passages · 7 writers · 1500s to 1900s

Writers who mention the sin while commenting on Hebrews 6 and 10 or on falling away from the faith.

1650

After this change, if ever we fall into the contrary state, and he wholly estranged from God and religion, and profess ourselves servants of unrighteousness, God hath made no more covenant of restitution to us; there is no place left for any more repentance, or entire change of condition, or new birth: a man can be regenerated but once; and such are voluntary malicious apostates, witches, obstinate impenitent persons, and the life. But if we be overtaken by infirmity, or enter into the marches or borders of this estate and commit a grievous sin, or ten, or twenty, so we be not in the entire possession of the devil, we are, for the present, in a damnable condition if we die; but if we live, we are in a recoverable condition; for so we may repent often.

Jeremy Taylor, Taylor, Holy Living 4.10.1

1755–1765

6. And have fallen away - Here is not a supposition, but a plain relation of fact. The apostle here describes the case of those who have cast away both the power and the form of godliness; who have lost both their faith, hope, and love, ver. 10, &c., and that wilfully, chap. x, 26. Of these wilful total apostates he declares, it is impossible to renew them again to repentance. (though they were renewed once,) either to the foundation, or anything built thereon. Seeing they crucify the Son of God afresh - They use him with the utmost indignity.

John Wesley, Wesley, Notes on the Bible 19.6

1758

If any think that the apostle here used expressions too high to denote any gifts of the Spirit common to good and bad men, though miraculous gifts, I answer, that the drift of the apostle, and his argument in those words, led him to set forth the greatness of the privilege that such persons had received, that he might the better show the exceeding aggravations of their apostacy, whence what the apostle says might be the more easily believed, viz. that it was impossible to renew them again to repentance. For it is certain that he intends the aggravatedness of their crime, as a reason of it, because he himself gives it as a reason of it, ver. 6. in those words, “Seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.”

Jonathan Edwards, Edwards, Notes on the Bible 24

1834–1885

(10) we may learn from the views presented in this chapter Heb 10:26, Heb 10:29, the error of those who suppose that a true Christian may fall away and be renewed again and saved. If there is any principle clearly settled in the New Testament, it is, that if a sincere Christian should apostatize, "he must perish." There would be no possibility of renewing him.

Albert Barnes, Barnes, Notes on the Bible Hebrews 10:39

1902

We have boldness to enter into the holiest in the blood of Jesus (10:19). His blood is the blood of the covenant with which we are sanctified, and to lapse from the Christian religion is to be guilty of the inconceivable, the unpardonable sin, of counting that blood a profane thing (10:29). In all these ways the death of Christ is defined as a sacrificial death, or as a death having relation to sin, the two things are one.

James Denney, Denney, The Death of Christ 7

The sin unto death and prayer for the sinner

12 passages · 9 writers · 100s to 1900s

Writers who mention the sin unto death of 1 John 5:16 and the limit on prayer for it.

357–378

Clerics who are guilty of the sin unto death are degraded from their order, but not excluded from the communion of the laity.

Basil of Caesarea, Basil, The Letters 199 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 2, Vol. 8)

393

Hear what the Apostle John says: “He who knows that his brother sinneth a sin not unto death, let him ask, and he shall give him life, even to him that sinneth not unto death. But he that hath sinned unto death, who shall pray for him?” You observe that if we entreat for smaller offences, we obtain pardon: if for greater ones, it is difficult to obtain our request: and that there is a great difference between sins. And so with respect to the people of Israel who had sinned a sin unto death, it is said to Jeremiah: “Pray not thou for this people, neither entreat for them, and do not withstand me, for I will not hear thee.”

Jerome, Jerome, Against Jovinianus 2 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 2, Vol. 6)

1648

Fifthly, It cannot be affirmed with any probability that our Saviour should pray for all and every one of them, supposing some of them to be finally impenitent: for he himself knew full well “what was in man,” John ii. 25; yea, he “knew from the beginning who they were that believed not,” chap. vi. 64. Now, it is contrary to the rule which we have, 1 John v. 16, “There is a sin unto death,” etc., to pray for them whom we know to be finally impenitent, and to sin unto death.

John Owen, Owen, The Death of Death in the Death of Christ 1.8

1915

Moreover the “sin unto death” to which he refers, is evidently a complete falling away from Christ, and is not to be identified with the sins to which Tertullian refers, viz. “murder, idolatry, fraud, denial of Christ, blasphemy, and assuredly also adultery and fornication.”

Louis Berkhof, Berkhof, Introduction to the New Testament 29

Novatian, the lapsed, and penance

4 passages · 4 writers · 100s to 1800s

Writers who mention the sin while arguing about restoring those who fell after baptism or under persecution.

c. 190–202

Accordingly, being very merciful, He has vouch-safed, in the case of those who, though in faith, fall into any transgression, a second repentance; so that should any one be tempted after his calling, overcome by force and fraud, he may receive still a repentance not to be repented of. “For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, but a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.” But continual and successive repentings for sins differ nothing from the case of those who have not believed at all, except only in their consciousness that they do sin. And I know not which of the two is worst, whether the case of a man who sins knowingly, or of one who, after having repented of his sins, transgresses again.

Clement of Alexandria, Clement of Alexandria, The Stromata, or Miscellanies 2.13 (Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 2)

c. 362–389

But Novatus, you say, would not receive those who lapsed in the persecution. What do you mean by this? If they were unrepentant he was right; I too would refuse to receive those who either would not stoop at all or not sufficiently, and who would refuse to make their amendment counterbalance their sin; and when I do receive them, I will assign them their proper place; but if he refused those who wore themselves away with weeping, I will not imitate him. And why should Novatus’s want of charity be a rule for me?

Gregory of Nazianzus, Gregory of Nazianzus, Select Orations of Saint Gregory Nazianzen 22 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 2, Vol. 7)

1540–1564

With this testimony Novatus and his sect formerly armed themselves, in order to take away the hope of pardon from all indiscriminately who had fallen after baptism. They who were not able to refute his calumny chose rather to deny the authority of this Epistle than to subscribe to so great an absurdity. But the true meaning of the passage, unaided by any help from any other part, is quite sufficient of itself to expose the effrontery of Novatus Those who sin, mentioned by the Apostle, are not such as offend in any way, but such as forsake the Church, and wholly alienate themselves from Christ.

John Calvin, Calvin, Commentary on Hebrews 10.5 (Calvin's Commentaries, Vol. 44)

1872

The doctrine that post-baptismal sins are unpardonable, having been rejected as heretical, the Romish theologians adopted the theory that the satisfaction of Christ availed only to the remission of the penalty of eternal death; leaving the sinner bound to suffer the temporal punishment due to his transgressions or to make satisfaction for them.

Charles Hodge, Hodge, Systematic Theology III.7.2 (Vol. 2)

Judas, Peter, and despair

10 passages · 8 writers · 300s to 1800s

Writers who mention Judas, Peter, or despair when discussing whether a sin can be forgiven.

c. 419–429

Of another sort of dejection which produces despair of salvation. There is, too, another still more objectionable sort of dejection, which produces in the guilty soul no amendment of life or correction of faults, but the most destructive despair: which did not make Cain repent after the murder of his brother, or Judas, after the betrayal, hasten to relieve himself by making amends, but drove him to hang himself in despair.

John Cassian, John Cassian, The Twelve Books on the Institutes of the Cœnobia, and the Remedies for the Eight Principal Faults 9.9 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 2, Vol. 11)

c. 440–461

And hence, Judas, thou art proved more criminal and unhappier than all; for when repentance should have called thee back to the Lord , despair dragged thee to the halter. Thou shouldest have awaited the completion of thy crime, and have put off thy ghastly death by hanging, until Christ’s Blood was shed for all sinners. And among the many miracles and gifts of the Lord’s which might have aroused thy conscience, those holy mysteries, at least, might have rescued thee from thy headlong fall, which at the Paschal supper thou hadst received, being even then detected in thy treachery by the sign of Divine knowledge. Why dost thou distrust the goodness of Him, Who did not repel thee from the communion of His body and blood, Who did not deny thee the kiss of peace when thou camest with crowds and a band of armed men to seize Him.

Leo the Great, Leo the Great, The Letters and Sermons of Leo the Great 5.27 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 2, Vol. 12)

1650

8. Remember that despair belongs only to passionate fools or villains, such as were Achitophel and Judas, or else to devils and damned persons; and as the hope of salvation is a good disposition towards it, so is despair a certain consignation to eternal ruin. A man may be damned for despairing to be saved. Despair is the proper passion of damnation. “God hath placed truth and felicity in heaven, curiosity and repentance upon earth, but misery and despair are the portions of hell.”V.

Jeremy Taylor, Taylor, Holy Living 4.3.4

1867

But I will not, cannot believe, O my Lord, that thou wouldst not forgive thy enemy, even when he repented, and did thee right. Nor will I believe that thy holy death was powerless to save thy foe—that it could not reach to Judas. Have we not heard of those, thine own, taught of thee, who could easily forgive their betrayers in thy name? And if thou forgivest, will not thy forgiveness find its way at last in redemption and purification?

George MacDonald, MacDonald, Unspoken Sermons 4 (Vol. 1)

Unbelief as the sin that keeps all others unforgiven

2 passages · 2 writers · 400s to 1800s

Writers who name unbelief as the sin that keeps all others unforgiven.

c. 406–421

Let men, therefore, believe in Christ, that they be not convicted of the sin of their own unbelief, whereby all sins are retained: let them make their way into the number of believers, that they be not convicted of the righteousness of those, whom, as justified, they fail to imitate: let them beware of that future judgment, that they be not judged with the prince of the world, whom, judged as he is, they continue to imitate.

Augustine of Hippo, Augustine, Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 96 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 1, Vol. 7)

1869–1873

[Because...not believed...name...Son of God.] This sentence is justly thought to prove that no sin is so great, and so damning and ruinous to the soul, as unbelief. In one sense it is the only unpardonable sin. All other sins may be forgiven, however many and great, and a man may stand complete before God.

J.C. Ryle, Ryle, Expository Thoughts on John John 3:9-21 (Expository Thoughts on the Gospels, Vol. 4)

Brief identifications of the sin

8 passages · 7 writers · 300s to 1900s

Writers who name what the sin is, or who commits it, in a sentence or two.

1650

10. Consider this also, that tediousness of spirit is the beginning of the most dangerous condition and estate in the whole world. For it is a great disposition to the sin against the Holy Ghost: it is apt to bring a man to backsliding and the state of unregeneration; to make him return to his vomit and his sink; and either to make the man impatient, or his condition scrupulous, unsatisfied, irksome, and desperate: and it is better that he had never known the way of godliness, than, after the knowledge of it, that he should fall away. There is not in the world a greater sign that the spirit of reprobation is beginning upon a man than when he is habitually and constantly, or very frequently, weary, and slights or loathes holy offices.

Jeremy Taylor, Taylor, Holy Living 4.8.7

1706

Perhaps the kind of offence might be such as did not expose the offender to the censure of the civil magistrate, but, if it was done presumptuously, God himself would take the punishment of it into his own hands, and into them it is a fearful thing to fall. In the New Testament we find the like sentence of exclusion from all benefit by the great sacrifice passed upon the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost, and a total apostasy from Christianity.

Matthew Henry, Henry, Commentary on Numbers 15.3 (Commentary on the Whole Bible, Vol. 1)

1885

It is the heart of the child that alone can understand the Father. Would you have me think you guilty of the sin against the Holy Ghost—that you understand Jesus Christ and yet will not obey him? That were too dreadful.

George MacDonald, MacDonald, Unspoken Sermons 12 (Vol. 2)

1902

There was the sense underlying all His early success, to speak of it in such language, of an irreconcilable antipathy in His adversaries, of a temper which would incur the guilt of eternal sin rather than acknowledge His claims (Mark 3:20-30); there was the consciousness, going back, if we can trust the evangelic narrative at all, to very early days, that the most opposite parties were combining to destroy Him (Mark 3:6).

James Denney, Denney, The Death of Christ 4

The world to come, purgatory, and eternal punishment

3 passages · 3 writers · 1500s to 1800s

Writers who raise the world to come, purgatory, or eternal punishment in connection with the saying.

1540–1564

With regard to the inference drawn by the Papists, that the sins of men are forgiven after death, there is no difficulty in refuting their slander. First, they act foolishly in torturing the expression, future life, to mean an intermediate period, while any one may perceive that it denotes “the last judgment.” … This is an acknowledgment, that there is no hope of salvation to any one whose guilt is not pardoned before death. To the dead, therefore, there remains no forgiveness, except as regards punishment; and surely they will not venture to deny that the subject of this discourse is guilt.

John Calvin, Calvin, Harmony of the Evangelists, Vol. 2 1.13 (Calvin's Commentaries, Vol. 32)

1758

“It shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world nor in the world to come.” Some sins may not be forgiven in this world, that yet are forgiven in the world that is to come. God does not manifest his forgiveness in this world, but is provoked sometimes by the grievous fall of the godly, in a great measure to hide his face as long as they live.

Jonathan Edwards, Edwards, Notes on the Bible 16

1873

3. But Christ and the Apostles not only failed to correct the teachings of the Jews of their day concerning the everlasting punishment of the wicked, but they themselves also taught that doctrine in the most explicit and solemn manner. It is asserted affirmatively that future punishment is everlasting; in the negative form that it can never end; that there is in the future world an impassable gulf between the righteous and the wicked; and that there are sins which can never be forgiven either in this life or in the life to come. Thus if words can teach this doctrine it is taught in the Bible from the beginning to the end.

Charles Hodge, Hodge, Systematic Theology IV.4.6 (Vol. 3)